RSS

My Guest is TERRY AMBROSE

28 Jan

by Earl Staggs

My guest today is Terry Ambrose, an interesting guy, a good writer, and he’s telling us about how his latest book came about.  He also has a question at the end, so please feel free to jump in with your thoughts.

And now, here’s Terry.

Thanks for hosting me today on your blog, Earl. When we set this up, you asked how I came up with the ?????????????idea for my new book, “License to Lie.” As it is with many authors, it was a series of events that led to the idea. I was in the middle of trying to market my Hawaiian mystery, “Photo Finish,” to agents and the rejection pile was growing. I’d just finished the second book in that series and thought a break from the cantankerous McKenna might be in order. I love the way McKenna digs himself into trouble until the only way out is to solve the crime, but I also wanted to try something different. Really different.

“Photo Finish” is told from McKenna’s point of view, but the female con artist plays a heavy role in the book. The next logical step in my mind was to give her equal importance in my next work. But, books with a criminal as the protagonist have been done before and that still wasn’t different enough for me. However, by making her a co-protagonist with a really good guy did intrigue me.

I tend to write by the motto of “Go big or go home” and started looking into dual protagonist novels, of which there were very few. That was good. Everyone wants fresh, right? After I was hooked on the idea, I discovered that the writing gurus proclaim, “Thou shalt only have one protagonist.” It’s some sort of basic writing rule that, when violated, destines you to writing purgatory.

My first reaction was “uh oh.” Second reaction: “expletive” them. I liked the female con artist character and wanted to write about her again. I also had a male forensic hypnotist from another series I wrote some time back that, with some changes, would make an interesting co-protagonist. Best of all? The underlying problem these two would always face—trust. The book could be described as “Moonlighting meets White Collar” and is driven by the theme, “Never trust a soul…even your own.”

One of the difficulties I faced early on was writing the voice of the female con artist. I thought I knew what women sounded like, so how hard could it be to write that onto paper? Obviously, the character needed to sound like a woman and not a man writing like a woman—kind of that “Victor-Victoria” thing but without one of the levels. My critique group was composed mostly of women, several of them published multiple times. Next thing I knew, I had these long-time writers telling me “she doesn’t sound like a woman” or “a woman wouldn’t do that.” What I was doing wasn’t working, but I’m determined and try to be a good student of human behavior. So, all of a sudden, I had to learn to write as if I were a woman—but not all the time. The book is written with the characters each telling alternate chapters (male POV in one, female in the next, etc.) Once I got started, it was like having a sex-change operation every time I sat down at the computer. Talk about conflicted. Move over, Mrs. Doubtfire.

You can find out more about me and my two Goodreads giveaways for License to Lie and Photo Finish at terryambrose.com. But hurry, those giveaways end very soon! Find me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter as @suspense_writer.

I’m interested in how your readers deal with points of view, Earl. Do they like to read/write novels with tight points of view or prefer the omniscient world view? For them, does not knowing what a character is thinking generate more suspense than knowing?

 
12 Comments

Posted by on January 28, 2013 in Uncategorized

 

12 Responses to My Guest is TERRY AMBROSE

  1. Sylvia Dickey Smith

    January 28, 2013 at 7:15 am

    Hi, Terry. Good post! I write third person POV. Prefer to do that because I often like to bring in a second or third person’s POV within a manuscript. To me, it deepens the tale. I find first person limiting. Omniscient can be done well, but I find most writers don’t. And many of those appear to think they’ve done so, but instead, all they have done is head-hop–very distracting and irritating for the reader,

    I smiled when you described your experience writing in the voice of a female. When I wrote my first scene in the voice of my very bad guy, I had to get up and walk around, reminding myself I wasn’t that bad guy–because I sure felt evil. Scary!!

     
  2. Marilyn Meredtih

    January 28, 2013 at 8:21 am

    I always write in close third person and in my Rocky Bluff P.D. series, I use multiple points of view, though different characters have starring roles in each book. In my Deputy Tempe Crabtree series, I only use Tempe’s POV. (I’ve used another a couple of times when there was no other way to get some important information across.)

     
  3. Terry Ambrose

    January 28, 2013 at 8:28 am

    Hi Marilyn and Sylvia, thanks for stopping by! So far, sounds like two votes for no head hopping! Yeah! I like that.

    Sylvia, I agree that head hopping is annoying. So often, authors don’t even realize they’ve done it or that by NOT hopping around in different character’s POVs, they could increase the tension in a scene. Ah well.

    Marilyn, I know what you mean about getting important information across. Sometimes I have to get really, creative in the ways to pass along info!

     
  4. Ruby

    January 28, 2013 at 9:15 am

    Terry, what a great motto you have. I can identify with a female protagonist sounding like a man, but the same goes for a woman trying to write like a man. It’s difficult and it’s good that you have a critique group to hold your feet to the fire. Thanks for a great post.

     
  5. Terry Ambrose

    January 28, 2013 at 10:51 am

    Hi Ruby, thanks! I’ve been fortunate to have been in some excellent critique groups over the years. They can have great value even when they’re annoying :-)

     
  6. Vonnie

    January 28, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    Great concept. Dual protagonists with conflicting agenda. However that gives you great scope to really dig in on the deep povs.

     
  7. Terry Ambrose

    January 28, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    Thanks, Vonnie! You’re correct. That’s the kind of book that I like also, one where I get to know the character. Thanks for stopping by!

     
  8. sirsteve

    January 28, 2013 at 5:35 pm

    Of course you can have more than one more protagonist in a book. Make it work. That’s what writers do. Congrats!

     
  9. Ann Everett

    January 28, 2013 at 9:55 pm

    Interesting blog. I personally don’t head hop in my novels and tend not to like it in those I read. However, it’s just a matter of taste. I feel rules are made to be broken, and if you like having multiple pov’s, I consider it your style.
    Recently, I heard someone speak about passive voice. She pointed out how the word “was” happened to be a pet peeve of hers. Well, I came right home and did a word search to see how many times I’d used the word “was” in my latest novel. It “was” a lot!! As it turns out, I’m influenced by my favorite author who also used that word a lot. (She happens to be both a NYT and USA best seller.) So, my point is…it’s just a matter of style.
    As long as you’re a good storyteller, and you don’t have a lot of grammar mistakes, the average reader isn’t aware of head hopping!! Just my opinion.

     
  10. Terry Ambrose

    January 28, 2013 at 11:15 pm

    Hi Ann, thanks for stopping by! I think if you’re a good story teller and don’t have a lot of mistakes, you’ll get away with a lot. That omniscient point of view is certainly a valid one. It just tends to make the characters more distant for me as a reader. The beauty of books, though, is that there’s a style for all of us!

     
  11. Jake

    January 29, 2013 at 9:58 am

    Interesting post. In response to your question: “does not knowing what a character is thinking generate more suspense than knowing?” As a reader my response is a qualified depends on the story writer is conveying. There are times when it seems absolutely necessary & other places seems writer tosses in to fill page quota. Fan of Marilyn Meredith who always gives me correct amount in proper place.

     
  12. Terry Ambrose

    January 29, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    Hi Jake, that’s a great response. I, too, get really irritated when authors deliberately withhold information and there’s no point. I hadn’t even thought of that option because I try never to do that! Thanks for stopping by and your comment!

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers

%d bloggers like this: